Saturday, January 20, 2018

Murder and Residential Integration: More on Grand Rapids’ Most Recent Double-Murder

[Re: “Double Murder in Grand Rapids, and Not the First Murders of the Year There, Either.”]

Friday, January 19, 2018, 8:30 P.M.

Wasn’t it Machiavelli who said when you kill your enemies, kill their children, as well, so they can never avenge their parents’ deaths?

By Grand Rapids Anonymous
Friday, January 19, 2018 at 9:29:00 P.M. EST

That's REALLY called, "thinking ahead." Quite brilliant in its evil foresight, and though the black thug that committed these murders in GR never heard of Machiavelli (except perhaps as part of a rap thing), it very well could be what happened. Also, these kinds of murders usually ignite a month of other murders in retaliation. It happens repeatedly here.

The one committed today on Straight Street—I wonder about being in that category of retribution. When they ID the vic, I'll let you know. Stay tuned.

By Grand Rapids Anonymous
Saturday, January 20, 2018 at 10:27:00 A.M. EST

This quote from the husband and grandfather of woman and 2 year old shot dead

(WOODTV) Darrell Brown fears that he was the target.

“Whatever was on his mind it looked like it was against me,” Brown said. He was a coward.”

Brown said he has suspicions about who did it, but he can’t say for sure.

GRA: Like I said, a hit. Wonder what kind of criminal activity Darrell Brown was into—to warrant that kind of visit from a thug.

This is why you don't want blacks in your neighborhood. What looks like an average situation—maybe from afar, the blacks look somewhat normal (for whites)—is not. The patriarch has something going on that puts his family in danger. Unfortunately, for whites living around them, THAT is what's normal for blacks—and why it's preferable to avoid them at all costs.

N.S.: And he won’t “snitch” on the monster who slaughtered his wife and baby grandson, which is also par for the course for black victims of “racism.”

Friday, January 19, 2018

NO DACA: The Sign, Coming to a Highway Overpass Near You



A virtual acquaintance sent me the above photograph, and the text below.

This worked out as I hoped. The entire overpass was turned into a sign.

The Dreamers came by and accosted us. They told us their sob stories. They asked us why didn’t we care?

My response?

When you were calling us racists
When you cheered on 8 years of Obama and planned for Hillary’s final destruction of the country
When you voted Democratic and promised to retake Aztlan for Mexico
When you laughed at the destruction of American Cities
Whey you laughed as our statues were destroyed
When our history was destroyed our books banned, our speech censored
When Hispanic gangs raped and killed and ran drugs....

Did YOU CARE? ...

No you didn’t give a f#ck
And that’s my attitude to you.

TCM's Sunday Film Noir of the Week for January 21 at 10 am ET, is Act of Violence (1949), Starring Van Heflin and Robert Ryan



By David in TN
Friday, January 19, 2018 at 5:00:00 PM EST


Robert Ryan is on a mission... of vengeance

TCM's Sunday Film Noir of the Week for January 21 at 10 am ET, is Act of Violence (1949). It stars Van Heflin as a WWII veteran living the good life in late 40's Los Angeles County building the post-war suburbs.

Van Heflin and a very young Janet Leigh

Heflin's character has a dark secret. As a POW in a German camp, he betrayed an escape attempt by his fellow prisoners, resulting in all but one being killed by the guards. Robert Ryan plays the lone survivor, Heflin's former friend now sworn to kill him.


Janet Leigh plays Heflin's young wife and Phyllis Thaxter Ryan's girl. Both ladies stand by their man.


Van Heflin (who, as previously mentioned, was called another Spencer Tracy) gives his usual outstanding performance as the guilt-ridden veteran seeking atonement. Ryan looks his usual sinister self as the limping avenger.



Double Murder in Grand Rapids, and Not the First Murders of the Year There, Either

By Grand Rapids Anonymous
Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 12:10:00 P.M. EST

It was double murder in GR (#3 and #4 of the year).

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) — A woman and her 2-year-old child grandson were killed in a shooting Wednesday in Grand Rapids.

Police have identified the victims as 46-year-old Germaine Brown and King Talbert.

Emergency responders were called to a residence on the 200 block of Montgomery Street SE, east of Jefferson Avenue, around 2:50 p.m. for a medical call. Upon arrival, responders found Brown and the child suffering from a gunshot wound. Brown was pronounced dead at the scene.

Brown’s husband called 911 to report the incident, was taken in for questioning by police and was released after determining he was not a suspect. Police don’t have anyone in custody at this time.

The child was taken to Helen DeVos Children’s Hospital, where he survived until 11:30 p.m., police said.

Police determined Brown resided at the home and was babysitting the child.

An autopsy will take place Thursday to determine the cause and manner of death, which police said they believe to be a gunshot wound.

GRA: Interesting case, in that who would shoot a 2-year-old?

Anonymous said...

Could both have been caught in crossfire?

The Gentle Grizzly

Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 5:35:00 P.M. EST

Anonymous said...

Husband (so far) cleared on double murder. Have seen that initial indication of innocence and then....

Police are thinking this was not random. My interpretation, since this is a black area, is a possible retaliation--a hit on both.

We'll see.


Friday, January 19, 2018 at 12:13:00 A.M. EST

N.S.: Wasn’t it Machiavelli who said when you kill your enemies, kill their children, as well, so they can never avenge their parents’ deaths?


Feminazis Got to Catherine Deneuve, but Not (Yet) to Brigitte Bardot, Who Has Denounced Them


Catherine Deneuve

By Nicholas Stix

Their method is to say to any prominent woman who breaks ranks with them, “Are you a Nazi? Well, you sound like a Nazi. Do you realize that most of the people cheering you are Nazis?!”

But that can’t be all.

Catherine Deneuve has so completely contradicted her previous position, and done so with such rapidity that heavy-duty coercion had to be involved. I hope we find out just what was in play.

This propaganda triumph is part of an American feminazi putsch that seeks to weaken enough Republican politicians running for election or re-election in 2018 with exaggerated or outright fraudulent charges of sexual harassment/assault/rape/whatever such that they can convince a majority of married white women to switch from voting Republican to Democrat, in order to seize Congress, and impeach and run out of office President Donald J. Trump.

This is not speculative on my part. A feminist talking head on MSNBC acknowledged a few weeks ago that the successful move to force leftwing Cong. John Conyers and Sen. Al Franken to resign was only in order to have credibility for their campaign to impeach Pres. Trump and run him out of office based on allegations made during the presidential campaign against him, asserting that he had been a masher 20 years earlier. Meanwhile, she condemned Republicans as “cynical” with a straight face.

One needs to keep in mind that the last election of a Republican president that leftists have not sought to overturn was Ike’s election in 1956.

A thing in Vanity Fair that is clearly part of the feminazi putsch juxtaposes sex goddess Brigitte Bardot’s condemnation of the feminazis, which the VF operative, Yohana Desta, vilifies with the flip-flop of Catherine Deneuve, whom the operative praises.


Bardot in 2007

Brigitte Bardot Lashes Out at “Hypocritical and Ridiculous” #MeToo Movement
Meanwhile, French star Catherine Deneuve is apologizing for her criticism of the movement, which supports women dealing with sexual misconduct.
By Yohana Desta
Vanity Fair
January 18, 2018, 10:29 a.m.

[Brigitte] Bardot’s comments arrive just days after 100 French women shared their controversial stance on the #MeToo crowd and its effects on men.

“Rape is a crime but insistent or clumsy flirting is not, nor is gallantry a macho aggression,” the letter read. “Men have been punished summarily, forced out of their jobs when all they did was touch someone’s knee or try to steal a kiss.”

It was signed by prominent French stars, including actress Catherine Deneuve. However, it seems Deneuve has already had a change of heart. After the outpour of backlash, in addition to sudden support from people she considers reprehensible, the actress published a letter in the newspaper Liberation apologizing to victims of sexual harassment.

“I fraternally salute all women victims of odious acts who may have felt aggrieved by the letter in Le Monde,” she wrote. “It is to them, and them alone, that I offer my apologies.”

The actress acknowledged that, over the course of her long career, she has witnessed uncomfortable situations and has heard stories of filmmakers abusing their power, creating “traumatic and untenable situations.”

Deneuve also spoke out specifically against French radio host and former porn star Brigitte Lahaie, one of the women who signed the original letter, who later said that some women can enjoy being raped. (She later apologized, saying, “What I meant to say,— because I know matters of sexuality by heart—, is that sometimes the body and the mind do not coincide.”) Deneuve said Lahaie’s comments were “worse than spitting in the face of all those who have suffered this crime.“

She also distanced herself more broadly from some of the supporters of the original letter: “That is why I would like to say to conservatives, racists, and traditionalists of all shades who decided it was strategic to give me their support that I am no dupe. They will have neither my gratitude nor my friendship. To the contrary. I am a liberated woman and I will stay that way.”
The thing opens,
A little over a week after 100 prominent French women signed a letter calling the #MeToo movement a “witch hunt” against men, actress Brigitte Bardot has decided to weigh in with her own thoughts on the push against sexual harassment. Rather than join the ranks, Bardot decried the movement, slamming the women who have come forward to share their stories.
“… the women who have come forward to share their stories.”

They’re not “sharing their stories,” they’re making charges against men that in most cases are completely baseless, and in some cases self-refuting.

Thirty years ago, evil people who were seeking to destroy the lives of day care providers made up outrageous stories of satanic sexual abuse of children, which were manifestly lies. They manipulated children into agreeing with them, and then shrieked, “Listen to the children!”

Innocent people spent years in prison.
“The vast majority are being hypocritical and ridiculous,” [Bardot] told the French magazine Paris Match, as translated by France 24.

Bardot, who is 83, noted that “lots of actresses try to play the tease with producers to get a role. And then, so we will talk about them, they say they were harassed . . . I was never the victim of sexual harassment. And I found it charming when men told me that I was beautiful or I had a nice little backside.”

This isn’t the first time Bardot has shared a controversial, harmful opinion. In the past, she has been fined for provoking discrimination and racial hatred against the Muslim community in France.

[Yohana Desta is a liar. While Bardot certainly did criticize Islam, she did so truthfully, and did not “provoke[e] discrimination and racial hatred” against Moslems in France. If only!]

Notice what Desta is doing: While claiming to be opposed to “sexual harassment” of women, she is emphasizing her loyalty to Islam.

Desta is a brain-dead machine for hating normal white men. She posts a racist interview Toni Morrison gave to her Twitter feed, with the comment, “this interview sustains me.” She posts a photograph of a woman who is apparently passing for black holding an award she has just received, commenting “this photo is my life coach.” She posts a photograph of Robert de Niro’s recent profanity-fill rant against President Trump, with “robert de niro ! ! ! ! ! #nbrgala”

Desta has been “Hollywood writer for Vanity Fair” for 18 months. This is what racial socialist outfits like VF want.]
Over the last few months, many actresses have shared stories about the unequal power dynamic in the film industry, and several have revolved around meetings with producers that amounted more or less to an aggressive flirting session. Ellen Pompeo summed up the problem well in a recent piece for The Hollywood Reporter, saying that she once took a meeting with now-disgraced producer Harvey Weinstein where she largely batted her eyelashes and tried to charm him. It’s part of a sordid tradition for aspiring stars, she claimed: “You think, ‘Not only do I have to show that I’m a good actress, but that director also has to in some way fall in love with me and at least become enamored with me.’ That never felt right or good to me.”
Talk about a reversal of morality and reality. Pompeo confesses to coming on to and sexually manipulating producers, but then casts herself as some sort of victim! It’s an “unequal power dynamic,” alright!

Victory for the First Amendment, or Pyhhric Victory? Richard Spencer Will Speak at Michigan State University


Maybe it's the style of clothes that helped him prevail--Richard Spencer used to wear some ugly-ass suits--but his current style meets with our approval at WEJB/NSU. But what on earth will he find to talk about?

By Reader-Researcher RC

Spence will speak on March 5—during semester break—according to the terms of a settlement agreement reached by attorneys for the university and Spencer ally, Cameron Padgett.

[N.S.: The Detroit News cut off Padgett’s first name, either as a slight, to limit readers’ knowledge, or out of incompetence.]

Spencer will also need serious security, or else communists and anarchists will simply do what they have done to him before, and blast megaphones, thereby making it impossible for the audience to hear him.

MSU will allow white nationalist to speak on campus

Spencer will speak March 5 at the Auditorium in the Pavilion for Agriculture and Livestock Education

N.S.: Commenters are already joking about how Spencer will be speaking in a building dedicated to bull[spit].

Joseph Sobran, on the Glories of Educational Progress

Re-printed by Nicholas Stix

“In 100 years we have gone from teaching Latin and Greek in high school to teaching Remedial English in college.”

N.S. note: I spent six years teaching remedial English in college (1992-1998).

Thursday, January 18, 2018

Why Democracy Sucks—the Abridged Version

By Nicholas Stix

At Countenance.

Is the Ideology of Color-Blindness as Good as Dead?

By Nicholas Stix

At Countenance, natch.

$250 Million

Last Thursday night, I believe it was, Lügenpresse chief honcho Ben Smith of BuzzFeed (formerly of Politico) was on MSNBC, talking with the hostess about the “Steele dossier” that Smith had loosed on the world. (I don’t know many of the mopes at MSNBC.)

This “dossier” is one of the most notorious journalistic hoaxes in the history of the printed word, and yet Smith and the mope were speaking as if it were a legendary scoop. He was chiding the most powerful leftwing media operations, e.g., the New York Times and Washington Post (who had passed on the hoax), for being obsessed with their status as “gatekeepers.” Smith spoke of “the public’s right to know.”

Other times over the past two weeks, we’ve heard other MSNBC
talking heads assert that the Steele dossier has “not been debunked,” just “not corroborated.”

You know what also has yet to be “corroborated”? The existence of Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, and of Dracula.

The Steele dossier is often described as “opposition research.” But “opposition research” entails digging up dirt on one’s client’s opponent, not making stuff up. And journalism organizations do not pay outside firms to do their “research” for them.

Ben Smith must be the world’s richest blogger. A few years ago,
MSNBC bought a 25% stake in his blog for $250 million.

A blog worth a billion dollars?! Like crime, lying sure pays these days.

I won’t be offended, if you give me something less than $250 million.

Please hit the PayPal “Donate” button at the top of the page, and make a generous donation to help me keep the Wyatt Earp Journalism Bureau/Nicholas Stix, Uncensored going.

I thank you, and your posterity will, too.


Nicholas Stix

Trump is Right about Countries in Black Africa (The Shithole Papers)


Village in Senegal

By An Old Friend

What I Learned in the Peace Corps in Africa: Trump is Right

By Karin McQuillan
January 17, 2018
American Thinker

Three weeks after college, I flew to Senegal, West Africa, to run a community center in a rural town.Life was placid, with no danger, except to your health.That danger was considerable, because it was, in the words of the Peace Corps doctor, "a fecalized environment."

In plain English: s--- is everywhere. People defecate on the open ground, and the feces is blown with the dust – onto you, your clothes, your food, the water. He warned us the first day of training: do not even touch water.

Human feces carries parasites that bore through your skin and cause organ failure.

Never in my wildest dreams would I have imagined that a few decades later, liberals would be pushing the lie that Western civilization is no better than a third-world country. Or would teach two generations of our kids that loving your own culture and wanting to preserve it are racism.

Last time I was in Paris, I saw a beautiful African woman in a grand boubou have her child defecate on the sidewalk next to Notre Dame Cathedral. The French police officer, ten steps from her, turned his head not to see.

Senegal was not a hellhole. Very poor people can lead happy, meaningful lives in their own cultures' terms. But they are not our terms. The excrement is the least of it. Our basic ideas of human relations, right and wrong, are incompatible.

As a twenty-one-year-old starting out in the Peace Corps, I loved Senegal. In fact, I was euphoric. I quickly made friends and had an adopted family. I relished the feeling of the brotherhood of man. People were open, willing to share their lives and, after they knew you, their innermost thoughts.


Market in Senegal

The longer I lived there, the more I understood: it became blindingly obvious that the Senegalese are not the same as us. The truths we hold to be self-evident are not evident to the Senegalese. How could they be? Their reality is totally different. You can't understand anything in Senegal using American terms.

Take something as basic as family. Family was a few hundred people, extending out to second and third cousins. All the men in one generation were called "father." Senegalese are Muslim, with up to four wives. Girls had their clitorises cut off at puberty. (I witnessed this, at what I thought was going to be a nice coming-of-age ceremony, like a bat mitzvah or confirmation.) Sex, I was told, did not include kissing. Love and friendship in marriage were Western ideas. Fidelity was not a thing. Married women would have sex for a few cents to have cash for the market.

What I did witness every day was that women were worked half to death. Wives raised the food and fed their own children, did the heavy labor of walking miles to gather wood for the fire, drew water from the well or public faucet, pounded grain with heavy hand-held pestles, lived in their own huts, and had conjugal visits from their husbands on a rotating basis with their co-wives. Their husbands lazed in the shade of the trees.

Yet family was crucial to people there in a way Americans cannot comprehend.

[Examples, please?]

The Ten Commandments were not disobeyed – they were unknown. The value system was the exact opposite. You were supposed to steal everything you can to give to your own relatives. There are some Westernized Africans who try to rebel against the system. They fail.

We hear a lot about the kleptocratic elites of Africa. The kleptocracy extends through the whole society. My town had a medical clinic donated by international agencies. The medicine was stolen by the medical workers and sold to the local store. If you were sick and didn't have money, drop dead. That was normal.

So here in the States, when we discovered that my 98-year-old father's Muslim health aide from Nigeria had stolen his clothes and wasn't bathing him, I wasn't surprised. It was familiar.

In Senegal, corruption ruled, from top to bottom. Go to the post office, and the clerk would name an outrageous price for a stamp. After paying the bribe, you still didn't know it if it would be mailed or thrown out. That was normal.

One of my most vivid memories was from the clinic. One day, as the wait grew hotter in the 110-degree heat, an old woman two feet from the medical aides – who were chatting in the shade of a mango tree instead of working – collapsed to the ground. They turned their heads so as not to see her and kept talking. She lay there in the dirt. Callousness to the sick was normal.

Americans think it is a universal human instinct to do unto others as you would have them do unto you. It's not. It seems natural to us because we live in a Bible-based Judeo-Christian culture.

We think the Protestant work ethic is universal. It's not. My town was full of young men doing nothing. They were waiting for a government job. There was no private enterprise. Private business was not illegal, just impossible, given the nightmare of a third-world bureaucratic kleptocracy. It is also incompatible with Senegalese insistence on taking care of relatives.

All the little stores in Senegal were owned by Mauritanians. If a Senegalese wanted to run a little store, he'd go to another country. The reason? Your friends and relatives would ask you for stuff for free, and you would have to say yes. End of your business. You are not allowed to be a selfish individual and say no to relatives. The result: Everyone has nothing.

The more I worked there and visited government officials doing absolutely nothing, the more I realized that no one in Senegal had the idea that a job means work. A job is something given to you by a relative. It provides the place where you steal everything to give back to your family.

I couldn't wait to get home. So why would I want to bring Africa here? Non-Westerners do not magically become American by arriving on our shores with a visa.

[Sure, they do. They hit the ground, and are immediately enriched by our magic dirt.]

For the rest of my life, I enjoyed the greatest gift of the Peace Corps: I love and treasure America more than ever. I take seriously my responsibility to defend our culture and our country and pass on the American heritage to the next generation.

African problemsare made worse by our aid efforts. Senegal is full of smart, capable people. They will eventually solve their own country's problems. [Or they won’t.] They will do it on their terms, not ours. The solution is not to bring Africans here.

We are lectured by Democrats that we must privilege third-world immigration by the hundred million with chain migration. They tell us we must end America as a white, Western, Judeo-Christian, capitalist nation – to prove we are not racist. I don't need to prove a thing. Leftists want open borders because they resent whites, resent Western achievements, and hate America. They want to destroy America as we know it.

As President Trump asked, why would we do that?

We have the right to choose what kind of country to live in. I was happy to donate a year of my life as a young woman to help the poor Senegalese. I am not willing to donate my country.

Germany Endures Another Merkel Murder



[Of related interest: “Nicholas Stix: Is the Final Solution to the German Question at Hand?”]

By Jerry PDX
Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 12:59:00 A.M. EST

Another young girl falls victim to Merkel's evil in the town of Kandell, Germany. Yes, we can lay this one, as all the others, right at her feet but she won't care. She has an ideology to fall back on that allows her to shut her mind to the murders and sexual assaults perpetrated by the mass importation of millions of Muslim and African males into Germany.

A 15-year-old German girl, named Mia V. in the article, is stabbed to death by her "15 year old" boyfriend, named only “Abdul D,” undoubtedly being sensitive to his underaged status. The article notes he claimed to be 14 when he arrived but according to the girl’s father he was "definitely not 15."

I'm sure he could have been 6' 4", with a full beard and grey hairs and they wouldn't have doubted his claim to be 14. That's how mindlessly idiotic PC blinders can be.

This crime has renewed calls to verify claims of “refugee” age status. One has to wonder why this has not been done since the beginning, since you end up placing adult males in schools with underaged females, if you do not.

Oh yeah, how could I forget? That kind of hysteria is reserved for white men. When it's brown and black-skinned Muslim males, then the rules are suspended. According to the article, Abdul will now undergo tests to determine his true age, though a bit late for his victim.

At the end of the article, there is of a statistical rationalization and dose of liberal guilt: First off, it mentions that there was a spike in crime initially with the first wave of male migrants, but then it dropped back down to regular levels. Assuming that's even true, of which I'm doubtful since more likely there has been some monkey business with crime reporting or statistics by behind-the-scenes diversity operatives, it's probably because women are no longer putting themselves in dangerous situations with refugees. They can no longer walk their own streets alone, because they know refugees will rape them at every opportunity, and the beta males of Germany will stand by and do nothing. They are actually setting up safe zones for women to keep from being raped by “refugees.”

Then the article points out that a German man murdered his wife and kids and asserts that if this crime had been a German boy, it wouldn't be getting so much attention. What a load of shyte. I mean really, the disingenuous arguments of liberal mindsets is a wonder to behold. If these Libyan and Afghani male refugees had never been allowed to stay in Germany, this young girl and the other girls and women, raped and/or murdered by these scumbags would all be alive or unharmed. There are always going to be some psychotic individuals who can commit deranged acts—can't be helped, humans are not perfect—but we do know that most of the time it's males doing that crap, so why bring in millions of young males who are unknown quantities and give them opportunity to lie their way into having access to young girls?

Ann Coulter: Democrats are Trying to Lie and Cry Bully Trump into Another Mass Illegal Alien Amnesty for Nothing!


I believe that's Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin (ZANU-PF) on the right, extending a finger of love

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

The Left's Dirty Little Secret - Cleaned by Rosa!

By Ann Coulter
January 17, 2018

One thing no liberal will ever turn down is the opportunity to get a standing ovation for accusing someone else of racism.

Democrats have placed their opening bid in the immigration talks on Trump's 10-yard line – a hilariously unbalanced "compromise" that is worse than their original proposal. Now, they are battering him with accusations of racism to force him into an amnesty deal that he was specifically elected to prevent.

Forced to choose, soccer moms are going with MSNBC – and, hey, if that means we'll still have Rosa to clean the house, well, that's OK, too!

Liberals have gotten a free ride for too long on using phony claims of "racism" to promote policies that hurt black people but help themselves. It's like spoiling a kid; by the time he's 15, it's impossible to get him to clean his room.

The virtue signalers have been out in force lately, putting in museum-quality performances ever since receiving an unsubstantiated report about Trump's alleged "s---hole countries" comment in a private meeting.

At least all the raging sanctimony is based on a solid source: the claims of one guy with a track record of making up things said in private meetings.

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) is the only person accusing Trump of referring to Haiti and African nations as "s---hole countries." Four people at the meeting deny it.

Headline on Politico: "Durbin Confirms Trump's "S---hole Remarks During Meeting"

Wow, so he not only leaked the remarks -- he confirmed them!

Just a few years ago, both the Obama White House and Republican House leaders denied Durbin's claim that a Republican congressman had said to President Obama, "I cannot even stand to look at you."

The four people who deny that Trump used the word "s---hole" are Trump himself, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, and Sens. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and David Perdue (R-Ga.). They have been required to retract nothing about the meeting. None of them have a history of being contradicted by both Republicans and Democrats over claims they made about a private conversation.


When it comes to Trump, our media have thrown the rulebook out the window. They make it up as they go along.

The virtue signalers are so proud of their anger, tears and profanity over Trump's alleged remark, they've taken to complimenting one another about their own performances:

You were awesome!

No, YOU were awesome!

Meanwhile, I can’t help but notice that there are some great openings for their kids at Haitian public schools in Brooklyn. We'd love to -- really -- but we've already made other arrangements (after pulling strings, waiting four years and paying tens of thousands of dollars to make sure their kids never go to school with blacks or immigrants).

I also can't help but notice that just as black Americans had won their full civil rights and were about to burst into the American economy ... Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) helped pass the 1965 immigration act that began dumping millions and millions of low-wage workers on the country to compete with them.

Obviously, the people hurt most by the mass immigration of low-skilled workers are black Americans, aka, The Only Reason We Care So Much About Racism. I refer you to the Jordan Report -- overseen by actual civil rights icon Barbara Jordan.

Far from making up for the legacy of slavery, our immigration policies solve the exact same problem that slavery solved: rich people's eternal need for cheap labor.

We don't owe immigrants anything. They aren't black Americans. We didn't do anything to the Mexicans streaming across our border. Or, for that matter, to the Haitians, Ecuadorians, Pakistanis and so on. No slavery, no Jim Crow laws, no redlining -- just billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid. (Hey, does anyone know if billions of dollars would be enough to pay for a wall?)

We certainly don't owe them more than we owe our own fellow citizens, especially our black fellow citizens, who could use our help.

But foreigners who showed up yesterday act like they're the descendants of American slaves, helping themselves to the jobs, affirmative action, government assistance and racial sensitivity meant for the likes of John Lewis and Chris Rock, not illegal alien Jose Antonio Vargas. (Not that Lewis and Rock need set-asides, etc, but they're the ones who deserve them.)

Our country is hypersensitive about race because of specific injustices done to black Americans, not because we wanted to shower favors on anyone in need of a handout who manages to sneak into our country.

The Democrats treat black people like the wife who will iron your shirt for a date with your mistress. They know they don't have to do anything to keep winning 90 percent of the black vote, so they've dedicated themselves to bringing in millions of Latin Americans who will vote for them -- and also do their gardening.

Wednesday, January 17, 2018





Excerpted by Nicholas Stix


[“Read the Sexposé of the Biggest Scandal of the 2016 Election, at the Only Place Carrying It Online!”]


It’s the October surprise that will shock the nation – a stunning g ENQUIRER special investigation exposes:






By Dylan Howard
October 16, 2017
National Enquirer

HOLLYWOOD superstars, busty bimbos, strippers, hookers shady figures from America’s underworld have all been SECRETLY paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in hush money for more than two decades in a sordid scheme to help Hillary Clinton become president!

The women received the sleazy payoffs through Hillary’s political “hitman” recruited from the ranks of Hollywood’s devious fixers by a top film and television executive….



[To be continued!]

Read the Sexposé of the Biggest Scandal of the 2016 Election, at the Only Place Carrying It Online!



Excerpted by Nicholas Stix









DESTROY Bill’s sex victims

BRIBE reports to bury truth

RUIN Monica Lewinsky


Pay HUSH MONEY to hookers



October 31, 2016 [On newsstands circa October 15, 2017.]

[N.S.: Note that the MSM covered up on Hillary Clinton’s behalf the very things that they then screamed, and continue to scream from the rooftops, regarding Donald Trump. To be continued!]

Pat Buchanan: Trump May Not Permit Himself to be Intimidated by the Racist Left Out of Considering Race in Immigration Policy

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

Trump: In Immigration Debate, Race Matters
By Patrick J. Buchanan
Tuesday - January 16, 2018 at 2:39 a.m.

President Trump “said things which were hate-filled, vile and racist. … I cannot believe … any president has ever spoken the words that I … heard our president speak yesterday.”

So wailed Sen. Dick Durbin after departing the White House.

And what caused the minority leader to almost faint dead away?

Trump called Haiti a “s—-hole country,” said Durbin, and then asked why we don’t have more immigrants from neat places “like Norway.”

With that, there erupted one of the great media firestorms of the Trump era. On Martin Luther King Day, it was still blazing.

Trump concedes he may have disparaged Haiti, which, at last check, was not listed among “Best Places to Live” in the Western Hemisphere. Yet Trump insists he did not demean the Haitian people.

Still, by contrasting Norway as a desirable source of immigrants, as opposed to Haiti, El Salvador and Africa, Trump tabled a question that is roiling the West, the answer to which will decide its fate.

Trump is saying with words, as he has with policies, that in taking in a million people a year, race, religion and national origin matter, if we are to preserve our national unity and national character.

Moreover, on deciding who comes, and who does not, Americans have the sovereign right to discriminate in favor of some continents, countries and cultures, and against others.

Moreover, in stating his own preferences, Trump is in a tradition as old as the Republic.

The original Colonies did not want Catholics here. Ben Franklin feared Pennsylvania was being overrun by stupid Germans:

“Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion.”

Just as anti-immigrant parties have arisen in Europe to stem the flood of refugees from the Mideast and Africa, an American Party (“Know-Nothings”) was formed to halt the surge of Irish immigrants during the Potato Famine of 1845-1849.

Lincoln wanted slaves repatriated to Africa. In the 19th and 20th centuries, we had Chinese and Japanese exclusion acts.

Have something to say about this column?

“Californians have properly objected” to Japanese migrants, said V.P. nominee FDR “on the sound basic ground that … the mingling of Asiatic blood with European or American blood produces, in nine cases out of ten, the most unfortunate results.”

After the Great Migration of Italians, Poles, Jews and East Europeans, from 1890 to 1920, the Immigration Act of 1925 established quotas based on the national origins of the American people in 1890, thus favoring Brits, Scots-Irish, Irish and Germans.

Civil rights leader A. Philip Randolph, a major figure in Dr. King’s March on Washington, said of the Harding-Coolidge restrictive quotas:

“We favor reducing immigration to nothing … shutting out the Germans … Italians … Hindus … Chinese and even the Negroes from the West Indies. The country is suffering from immigration indigestion.”

The Senate floor leader of the 1965 Immigration Act addressed what were then regarded as valid concerns about the future racial and ethnic composition of the country. Sen. Edward Kennedy pledged:

“Our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually … the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset. … S. 500 will not inundate America with immigrants from … the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia.”

What Kennedy assured America would not happen, did happen.

Today, issues of immigration and race are tearing countries and continents apart. There are anti-immigrant parties in every nation in Europe. Turkey is being bribed to keep Syrian refugees out of Europe.

Boatloads of Africans from Libya are being turned back in the Med. After building a wall to keep them out, Bibi Netanyahu has told “illegal aliens” from Africa: Get out of Israel by March, or go to jail.

Angela Merkel’s Party may have suffered irreparable damage when she let a million Mideast refugees in. The larger concentrations of Arabs, Africans and Turks in Britain, France and Germany are not assimilating. Central European nations are sealing borders.

Europe fears a future in which the continent, with its shrinking numbers of native-born, is swamped by peoples from the Third World.

Yet the future alarmed Europeans are resisting is a future U.S. elites have embraced. Among the reasons, endless mass migration here means the demographic death of the GOP.

In U.S. presidential elections, persons of color whose roots are in Asia, Africa and Latin America vote 4-1 Democratic, and against the candidates favored by American’s vanishing white majority. Not for the first time, liberal ideology comports precisely with liberal interests.

Mass immigration means an America in 2050 with no core majority, made up of minorities of every race, color, religion and culture on earth, a continent-wide replica of the wonderful diversity we see today in the U.N. General Assembly.

Such a country has never existed before. Are we on the Yellow Brick Road to the new Utopia — or on the path to national suicide?

Flights from Norway (Comic Graphic)


Kipling’s Classic Poem, “The Young British Soldier”



Re-posted by Nicholas Stix
From The Kipling Society

Among the blessings of the English language, the works of Rudyard Kipling are exceeded in beauty by those of only one individual author, Edward de Vere, alias William Shakespeare. (The King James Bible was a collective effort.)

A line from one of the poems in the collection Barrack Room Ballads and Other Verses, whence this ditty comes, became the title of the greatest novel to come out of World War II, "from here to eternity."

[Stix Note: “‘Arf” means half.]

The Young British

By Rudyard Kipling

WHEN the 'arf-made recruity goes out to the East
'E acts like a babe an' 'e drinks like a beast,
An' 'e wonders because 'e is frequent deceased
Ere 'e's fit for to serve as a soldier.
Serve, serve, serve as a soldier,
Serve, serve, serve as a soldier,
Serve, serve, serve as a soldier,
So-oldier of the Queen!

Now all you recruities what's drafted to-day,
You shut up your rag-box an' 'ark to my lay,
An' I'll sing you a soldier as far as I may:
A soldier what's fit for a soldier.
Fit, fit, fit for a soldier . . .

First mind you steer clear o' the grog-sellers' huts,
For they sell you Fixed Bay'nets that rots out your guts -
Ay, drink that 'ud eat the live steel from your butts -
An' it's bad for the young British soldier.
Bad, bad, bad for the soldier . . .

When the cholera comes - as it will past a doubt -
Keep out of the wet and don't go on the shout,
For the sickness gets in as the liquor dies out,
An' it crumples the young British soldier.
Crum-, crum-, crumples the soldier . . .

But the worst o' your foes is the sun over'ead:
You must wear your 'elmet for all that is said:
If 'e finds you uncovered 'e'll knock you down dead,
An' you'll die like a fool of a soldier.
Fool, fool, fool of a soldier . . .

If you're cast for fatigue by a sergeant unkind,
Don't grouse like a woman nor crack on nor blind;
Be handy and civil, and then you will find
That it's beer for the young British soldier.
Beer, beer, beer for the soldier . . .

Now, if you must marry, take care she is old -
A troop-sergeant's widow's the nicest I'm told,
For beauty won't help if your rations is cold,
Nor love ain't enough for a soldier.
'Nough, 'nough, 'nough for a soldier . . .

If the wife should go wrong with a comrade, be loath
To shoot when you catch 'em - you'll swing, on my oath! -
Make 'im take 'er and keep 'er: that's Hell for them both,
An' you're shut o' the curse of a soldier.
Curse, curse, curse of a soldier . . .

When first under fire an' you're wishful to duck,
Don't look nor take 'eed at the man that is struck,
Be thankful you're livin', and trust to your luck
And march to your front like a soldier.
Front, front, front like a soldier . . .

When 'arf of your bullets fly wide in the ditch,
Don't call your Martini a cross-eyed old bitch;
She's human as you are - you treat her as sich,
An' she'll fight for the young British soldier.
Fight, fight, fight for the soldier . . .

When shakin' their bustles like ladies so fine,
The guns o' the enemy wheel into line,
Shoot low at the limbers an' don't mind the shine,
For noise never startles the soldier.
Start-, start-, startles the soldier . . .

If your officer's dead and the sergeants look white,
Remember it's ruin to run from a fight:
So take open order, lie down, and sit tight,
And wait for supports like a soldier.
Wait, wait, wait like a soldier . . .

When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
And the women come out to cut up what remains,
Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
An' go to your Gawd like a soldier.
Go, go, go like a soldier,
Go, go, go like a soldier,
Go, go, go like a soldier,
So-oldier of the Queen!

The Young British Soldier


[October 12th 2017]


First published in the Scots Observer on June 28th 1890. The poem is listed in ORG as No. 465.

It is collected in:

  • Barrack Room Ballads and Other Verses (1892)
  • Inclusive Verse (1919)
  • Definitive Verse (1940)
  • The Sussex Edition vol xxxii (1939)
  • The Burwash Edition vol xxv (1941)
  • Cambridge Edition (2013) Ed. Thomas Pinney, p. 204.

The poem

This is one of the first group of Barrack Room Ballads, published after Kipling had returned to England in 1889. [What about 1890?] It is sung or recited by an experienced soldier giving good advice to young half-trained men who have just arrived in India and are misbehaving in a foolish and dangerous manner.

[The points of the foregoing paragraph were obvious in the poem, and thus unnecessary, ditto for the next one, except for the last clause.]

Watch what you drink, take care when the cholera is about, keep your sun-helmet on, work willingly, if you must marry, marry a sensible older woman, look after your rifle, sit tight if your officer is killed, and if you are wounded and left on the battlefield, shoot yourself before the enemy's womenfolk can come out and carve you up; wisdom that the young Kipling must have heard when chatting to privates and NCOs of the British regiments stationed in Lahore.

See "Kipling and the British Army in India" by Charles Carrington. In his biography of Kipling Carrington writes (p. 212):
No author in any literature has composed in verse or prose, so full and varied amd [sic] so relentlessly realistic a view of the soldier's life, with its alterations of boredom and terror, its deadening routine, its characteristic vices and corruption, its rare glories and its irrational fascination...

Notes on the text

[Verse 1]

'Arf made recruity a young man who had had some basic training and has been posted to a regiment in the East. He is instructed in techniques which will not only save his life but also give him a more comfortable time.

[Verse 2]

rag-box slang for 'mouth'.

lay song

[Verse 3]

grog strictly a mixture of rum and water that used to be issued in the Royal Navy until 1970, but often applied to any kind of alcoholic drink.

Fixed Bay'nets slang for a particularly dangerous alcoholic drink usually made in unhygienic surroundings and guaranteed to harm the drinker, if not kill him. 'Bay'nets' is short for 'bayonets', daggers which can be fixed to the barrel of a rifle to turn it into s spear, dangerous weapons.

butts in this contest the wooden stock of the rifle with a metal plate on the end which hits the ground at "Order Arms."

[Verse 4]

cholera caused by a number of types of cholerae, with some producing more severe disease than others. It is spread mostly by food and water that has been contaminated with human excrement containing the bacterium. See Dr. Gillian Sheehan's "Kipling and Medicine", and "Cholera Camp".

Keep out of the wet perhaps the wet canteen where liquor is sold, perhaps just keep out of the rain if possible for fear of a chill leading to other complaints. There would be difficulty drying wet clothes as well.

grouse grumble

crack on nor blind curse and swear

[Verse 6]

cast for fatigue nominated for various domestic and other jobs about the barracks or camp, cleaning, removung rubbish, carrying stores about, sometimes as a mild form of punishment.
'cast' in this case, means 'chosen', as when an actor is chosen for a part.

[Verse 7]

Troop-sergeant the senior non-commissioned officer in a troop of the Royal Artillery.

[Verse 8]

swing hang. - see "Danny Deever"

[Verse 10]

Martini The Martini–Henry was a breech-loading single shot lever actuated rifle used by the British Army from 1871 which combined the falling-block developed by Henry O. Peabody, improved by the Swiss Friedrich.von Martini, combined with the polygonal rifling designed by Alexander Henry.

[Verse 11]

Bustles in this context frameworks attached to the rear of womens' dresses so the garment drapes elegantly.

limbers carts for carrying ammunition, the horses are attached to the front, the guns to the rear. The advice is to pick off the gunners who would be collecting ammunition from the limbers before they can open fire. See "The Jacket". [sic] and "Ubique".

[Verse 12]

ruin to run from a fight see "The Drums of the Fore and Aft, (Wee Willie Winkie. [sic] and "That Day".


Chinese Immigrant Who Served as CIA Agent in China, Arrested for Keeping Names and Phone Numbers of CIA Agents, and Locations of Secret Facilities; He’s Suspected of being Red Chinese Double-Agent Who Got Our Agents Killed

By Nicholas Stix

At Newsweek.

Tuesday, January 16, 2018

Mass Shooting of LEOs in York County, South Carolina

By A Texas Reader

4 York Co. law enforcement officers shot overnight, officials say

Three officers that were shot are York County Sheriff's Deputies. The other was a York County Police Officer that was part of their SWAT team. The incident occurred overnight into early Tuesday morning.

An Orgy of Racist Hatred on MLK Day!


“Protesters attend Martin Luther King Day "Rally Against Racism" in Times Square to protest President Trump on MLK Day on Monday.” Translation: It was a rally against white people.

By Nicholas Stix

As I walked my chief of research down the street to the city bus stop, on his way to school this morning, I caught part of the front page of the Daily News.

It showed a picture of Michael alias Martin Luther King Jr. and a big headline “… mare.”

That had to be the end of “nightmare.”

It turns out that all sorts of black supremacist preachers and their Democrat white Uncle Toms and Aunt Jemimas had gotten together for a racist hatefest against President Donald J. Trump, and white Americans.


I’m not going to say, “Martin Luther King Jr. would be spinning in his grave, to know that his life, a celebration of love, has been turned into an occasion for hate,” because the people who say that are either brain-dead or liars.

The crooked racists who got together to play “Can you top this?” in their pornographic hatred of a white president and white Americans, spent years praising that same president, with their hands out, while he greased their palms.

New York officials denounce Trump as racist and maniac on Martin Luther King Day
By Jillian Jorgensen, Kerry Burke, and Leonard Greene
New York Daily News
Updated: Monday, January 15, 2018, 8:57 P.M.

The “fierce urgency of now” that Martin Luther King Jr. espoused was on full display across the city where preachers and politicians pressed for change in the new age of Trump.

On a day when America honored the man hailed as the Drum Major for Justice, New Yorkers and many across the nation protested a President derided as the poster boy for bigotry.


City and state officials ripped President Trump as they honored King at the Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network’s Harlem headquarters — blasting the President for labeling Haiti and African nations “shithole countries,” and calling him everything from a racist to a maniac.

“It is embarrassing that this President comes from New York,” said Sharpton, who went on to call Trump’s vulgar comment a “national security threat” that could spark ISIS and Al Qaeda recruitment in Africa….

[Well, Al Sharpton said it, so it must be so.]

The holiday ceremony was an hours-long Trump trashing service, where speaker after speaker derided the President’s policies.

Mayor de Blasio criticized Trump’s tough immigration talk, and embraced the new Americans that helped the country thrive.


This man supports the killers and would-be killers of white policemen

“If you are a Haitian-American, thank you,” de Blasio said. “Thank you for your contributions to this city and this country. If you come from Africa and you have come here to make us better, thank you. If you left violence in El Salvador and now are helping to create a better community here in New York City, thank you. That is what we should be saying on a day that celebrates Martin Luther King Jr.”…

[Yes, MS-13 and the 18 Street gang “are helping to create a better community here in New York City.” Notice any groups that, according to Communist Mayor de Blah Blah Blah, are failing “to create a better community here in New York City”?]

In New York, thousands marked the holiday with a rally in Times Square, where demonstrators wrapped themselves in Haitian flags and protested political ignorance.
Holding signs that said, “Dump Trump,” and “Go Back to Your S---hole,” demonstrators urged the President to listen to some of King’s speeches.

“It’s important for America and Donald Trump to be re-educated,” said Roselaure Jorvelus, 36, a nurse practitioner from the Bronx.


“America stands on shoulders of my forefathers. As a Haitian-American, I’m a proud Haitian. It was very disrespectful. It was a disservice to the Haitian community and the African community to be called s---hole countries. This is my first rally ever. I just had to come — it was personal. We helped build this country. We are the American dream.”

[Ah, so Haitians built America, and whites must be re-educated. She is “a proud Haitian,” but not a proud America. Got it.]

“It’s important to show the nation that Haitians are a force,” said Nehemie Francois-Kamare, of Trenton, the red-and-blue Haitian flag shielding her from the cold.

“Everyone must know we are one nation and we’re stronger together. [Which nation is that? Haiti?] I am disgusted but I am not surprised given his track record.

It’s great we’ve come together on this important day, but our President is disgracing our nation. We’re no longer a progressive country. If Martin Luther King Jr. were here today, he’d be depressed, too.”

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand said Trump’s comments were not just beneath the Oval Office but “beneath the dignity of humanity.”

“Our country is better than this, even if our President isn’t,” she said. “And we have to call out these racist comments for what they are and fight back with political action.”


And as the pols ripped Trump, they also urged people to mobilize on their anger — all the way to the voting booth.

“Let us remember that all of us this November must march in there with the spirit of Dr. King and vote and turn it around and contain this fool that sits in the White House that needs to be removed because he does not represent our interests,” said Public Advocate Letitia James.

New York officials denounce Trump as racist and maniac on Martin Luther King Day, by Jillian Jorgensen, Kerry Burke, and Leonard Greene, New York Daily News, Updated: Monday, January 15, 2018, 8:57 P.M.]

So, that was the annual Michael “Martin Luther” King Jr. hatefest—a DPUSA two-minutes hate and campaign rally—all in the name of color-blind love.

I can't recall ever seeing a carnival of racist hatred at Washington's Birthday celebrations.

Jesse Jackson Sr. Praises and Thanks Donald Trump for a Lifetime of Service to African Americans (Video)

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix


A Thirteenth Reason for Abolishing MLK Day



[“Twelve Reasons Why Martin Luther King Day Should be Abolished.”]

By Nicholas Stix

His name wasn’t Martin Luther King Jr.; it was Michael King Jr.

He was born Michael King Jr., the son of Michael King Sr. Neither the father nor the son ever changed his name. So, how can you have a national holiday celebrating a man under a name he never legally bore?

This is similar to the Barack Obama problem, but the BO problem is worse. In “Obama’s” case, a man was illegally elected president of America twice running under a fake name.

Was Martin Luther King Jr.—You Know, America’s Official Greatest Intellectual—Actually a Big Dummy?

By Nicholas Stix

Funny thing is, we’ve had brilliant blacks, but nobody bows down at their feet.

By my VDARE colleague, Patrick Cleburne.

Google's Totalitarian Model

Via An Old Friend

“Don’t Be Evil”? Google is Becoming a Police State
Google employees are creating their own enclave of mandatory wokeness, but they're not content to keep this ideological policing within their own walls.
By Robert Tracinski
January 12, 2018
The Federalist

Back in the day, Google famously adopted the corporate motto, “Don’t be evil.” It hasn’t turned out so well.

The problem is that their motto didn’t define what constitutes evil, so it left an opening for narrow-minded zealots to commandeer company resources in a witch hunt against whatever they define as the forces of wickedness.
That’s what has happened at Google, which has adopted a corporate culture of quasi-totalitarian ideological uniformity that it is now starting to impose on everyone who uses its services. Which is, let’s face it, pretty much everyone. For now.

picture we get is a corporate culture of lockstep ideological uniformity, enforced by censorship, badgering, and blacklisting. Damore furnishes one note from a Google manager in 2015, addressed to “hostile voices.”
“I will never, ever hire/transfer you onto my team. Ever. I don’t care if you are perfect fit or technically excellent or whatever.

I will actively not work with you, even to the point where your team or product is impacted by this decision. I’ll communicate why to your manager if it comes up.

You’re being blacklisted by people at companies outside of Google. You might not have been aware of this, but people know, people talk. There are always social consequences.
Another manager proposed creating a “public-within-Google” document that “calls out those googlers who have made public statements that are unsupportive of diversity.” Other admit to maintaining their own blacklists based on “opinion[s] about religion, about politics, or about ‘social justice.'” While conservatives were regarded as “bad apples” to be excluded, other Googlers were recruiting or advocating for violent leftist “antifa” groups, with no apparent consequences. Then there’s this doozy:
Google’s internal company systems allowed employees and managers to maintain a ‘block list’ of other employees with whom they did not wish to interact. For example, if A adds B to her block list, B is not able to look A up in the company directory, communicate with A through the internal instant messaging system, view A’s contact information or management chain, or see A’s posts on internal social media. A and B would not be able to work together constructively on an engineering project if either person blocked the other.
“Peer bonuses” that were supposed to reward Google employees for outstanding work performance were also used, with management approval, to reward them for arguing against heterodox political views, while something called “social pecking” was used—”unambiguously,” in the words of one Google vice-president—to gang up on dissenters. If you read through the whole complaint you see what this kind of “pecking” looks like, and it looks a lot like—well, it looks a lot like angry political Twitter, complete with people lobbing obscenities at each other over politics.

What company in its right mind would encourage its employees to treat each other this way? Well, maybe a company that is not in its right mind. An internal presentation urging sensitivity for employees who are “living as a plural being”—which seems to refer to some kind of multiple personality disorder—lists one of the forbidden thoughts: “assumptions that we’re mentally damaged.” This is literally an environment where the insane are welcome and the sane are not.

All of this is part of a wider trend in Silicon Valley toward enforcing political conformity. Commenting on this trend a few years back, when some people were trying to blacklist Silicon Valley Trump supporters like Palmer Luckey and Peter Thiel, I wrote: “The logical conclusion, when you think about it, is that every company should have a Chief Political Officer in charge of monitoring the ideological deviations of its employees.” We can now see that Google is going one better. It has a whole culture of co-workers informing on each other and referring dissidents for what the Damore lawsuit calls “crowdsourced harassment.” I call it the self-enforcing police state.

Google is a private company and can create its own little enclave of mandatory wokeness if it likes, Damore’s lawsuit notwithstanding. The problem is that Googlers are not content to keep this ideological policing within their own walls. We discovered recently that when Donald Trump complains about “fake news,” that makes him the very worst threat in the entire world to freedom of the press.

But what happens when the Left inveighs against “fake news”? What happens is what Google just did to conservative websites—including The Federalist. David Harsanyi runs down the supposedly contested claims that Google has decided to flag for our Web site. It targets claims we didn’t make, links to debunkings that don’t address us, treats ideological partisans as if they are impartial fact-checkers, and applies scrutiny to publications on the Right that it doesn’t apply to those on the Left.

None of this makes sense if you view it as an objective attempt to police accuracy. It makes perfect sense if you view it as an attempt to pre-emptively discredit Googlers’ ideological enemies in the minds of unwary Google users. I don’t think this is going to be very effective, because it depends on Google users acting like Google employees and volunteering to enforce groupthink on themselves. But it is revealing about Google’s intent.

Some on the Right are responding to this by calling for Google to be regulated as a monopoly. That’s the best way to ensure that nothing changes. Regulating search engines as a public utility would tend to freeze the leading company in place, as regulators did with AT&T back in the day, and discourage new competitors from entering the field. Instead, let the market do its work. All the things that make me outraged about Google’s crusade for political correctness also strike me as signs of enormous weakness for the company, both internally and externally.

Internally, Google has the hallmarks of a company being run for its employees, to accommodate their private agendas, petty political vendettas, and weird psychological dysfunction—not to serve the interests of its shareholders, customers, or users. It’s clear from the documents in the Damore suit that there has been a disgruntled faction of right-leaning employees inside Google who have been complaining to the HR department about their treatment, but at this point, I doubt many of them will want to stay. There is already a steady trickle of Silicon Valley refugees, like Tim Ferriss and Sam Altman, fleeing what Ferriss calls “a peculiar form of McCarthyism masquerading as liberal open-mindedness.”

The other news from the lawsuit is that Google seems to have a very active HR department and a lot of mandatory internal meetings, which is also a bad sign. I expect that talented young engineers with nonconformist ideas won’t risk wasting years of their lives in such a repressive multi-layered bureaucracy. In short, the same impulses that led Silicon Valley entrepreneurs to upend established industries will now be working to upend Google.

Externally, Google’s whole business model is based on the fact that we let them relentlessly collect our data and mine it for information about our behavior and preferences. They’re trying to go even farther and get us to invite Google’s AI assistant into our homes, so they can monitor our lives in even finer and more intimate detail. If that’s their business plan, perhaps gaining a reputation as the PC thought police isn’t the best idea.

There is currently no good alternative to Google’s search engine—readers have recommended them to me, but so far none of them work half as well—or to some of its other services, like Web ads. But I’m certainly not going to volunteer to make any part of my life or my business too dependent on a Google product, and I’ll be eagerly looking for alternatives. Google isn’t quite 20 years old, and its dominance over the flow of our information is very, very recent in the scheme of things. It rose up by outmaneuvering bigger and more established rivals, and somebody can do the same to them.

If I were a tech entrepreneur, I would be slavering at the prospect of getting rich by knocking down such a bloated, bureaucratic, arrogant company. They’re practically asking for it, so get to work.

The Real MLK

By Nicholas Stix

By Patrick Cleburne.

MLK Jr. Day Hate Hoax? Racial Slurs Left on T-Shirt Stretched over Newton Resident's Mailbox



By A Texas Reader
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 11:02 p.m.

Racial slurs left on t-shirt stretched over Newton resident's mailbox

"It's not the proper way to wake up and enjoy Martin Luther King, Jr Day," said Marlin who was very disturbed by the display.

Monday, January 15, 2018

Twelve Reasons Why Martin Luther King Day Should be Abolished



By Nicholas Stix

1. King was such a bad man that his widow, Coretta Scott King, had to get a federal judge to place his FBI files under wraps until 2027, or there would have been scandal upon scandal, which would have either imperiled the movement to have a national holiday named for him, or at least have made such a movement look as ridiculous as it really was;

2. King is an idol like Mohammed. The holiday in his name therefore sanctifies every bad thing he ever did;

3. King was a serial plagiarist, who stole his title as a “Dr.” at Boston University from a white man, Jack Stewart Boozer. The King cult has helped destroy academic standards in America;

4. He was one of the greatest adulterers in American history, having literally had a girl (many girls, actually) or a prostitute (no disrespect to working girls intended) in every port. Thus has the King cult helped to destroy sexual morality in America;

5. He supported violence, declaring “Riots are the voice of the voiceless.” By his own admission, he deliberately used the so-called principle of non-violence to incite violence;

6. He degraded the black church into a partisan political organization that routinely violates the tax laws, and violates the very “constitutional principle” of the “separation of church and state” (never mind that no such principle exists in the constitution) that supporters of the King cult ruthlessly and one-sidedly impose on white Christians;

7. He was the most powerful supporter of Communism that this country had ever seen. He surrounded himself with Communists, and took their money: Stanley Levison, Hunter Pitts “Jack” O’Dell, Stanley Levison, Bayard Rustin, Myles Horton, Zilphia Horton, The Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth, Carl Braden, Anne Braden, James A. Dombrowski, Aubrey Williams, Abner W. Berry, Ahmed Ben Bella, et. al.;

8. He destroyed the concept of civil rights. As the most celebrated leader of the so-called civil rights movement, more appropriately called the black rights movement, which through verbal legerdemain took something that is the inheritance of every legal American citizen—civil or constitutional rights—he made them the private property of blacks, including blacks that aren’t even citizens;

9. He was America’s greatest orator, and did something that to my knowledge, no other major American orator has done. Whereas politicians typically wait for a later speech to contradict what they have claimed to be all that is near and dear to them, King accomplished this feat in the same, “I Have a Dream” speech. At different points in the speech, he both called on America to be guided by the principle of color-blindness, and to impose race-specific policies granting welfare and reparations programs to blacks. Thus did MLK contribute more than any other American to the degradation of oratory;

10. He undermined the rule of law in general, as something that only whites must obey, but which must serve blacks, and particularly the principle, enshrined in the 14th Amendment of equality under the law. The 1964 U.S. Civil Rights Act, which his cultists credit him with getting enacted, has served to relegate whites to the status of second-class citizens;

11. He was a traitor, and helped to mainstream treason. On April 4, 1967, he delivered a speech at New York’s Riverside Church which could have been written in Hanoi, and delivered via diplomat’s pouch, so true was it to Communist lies. King claimed to be speaking on behalf of peace, but it was the peace of the graveyard. He was acting as the advocate of the North Vietnamese Communists and their allies; and

12. His true beliefs were the opposite of the color-blindness to which he paid lip-service. At the time of his murder, he was in Memphis demanding hard racial quotas for all public service jobs, matching the black proportion of the populace, qualifications be damned.

Trump Breaks with Tradition of Martin Luther King Day

By Grand Rapids Anonymous
Monday, January 15, 2018 at 6:50:00 P.M. EST

Trump breaks tradition of MLK day—again, well done, sir.

In short, the story listed all the activities and memorials past presidents participated in since 1994. Clinton signed legislation, Bush invited blacks to the White House, Obama did his black thing—Trump?
He went golfing... [chuckle].

At ABC News.

Martin Luther King Jr. Would Have Stood with Trump: He Didn't Want Migrants from Third-World Hellholes Here, Either!



By Reader-Researcher RC

This weekend, the media was imploding over the unconfirmed "s**thole countries" comment that President Trump was accused of making by two far left Democrats who took part in an immigration meeting with the President. Sen. Dick Durbin claimed that the President used 'hate-filled, vile and racist' language in an immigration meeting. Now, to clarify, even if the dubious and leaked comments were said by the President, there is nothing 'racist' about them; to claim that they are racist is to confuse ethnicity with citizenship. Despite this - one of the media's main talking points, and a talking point by crazed and corrupt leftist

At Gateway Pundit.